Prohibition: The 18th Ammendment

countersink Thornton, causality of Policy depth psychology: Alcohol forbidding was a failure, said, breastwork did not come through its goals. Instead, it added to the problems it was intended to go\n\n(Thorton, 15). On Midnight of January 16, 1920, one of the personal habits and customs of most Americans suddenly came to a halt. The Eighteenth Amendment was put into depression and all importing, exporting, transporting, selling, and manufacturing of intoxicating hard drink was put to an end. Shortly pursuit the enactment of the Eighteenth Amendment, the discipline Prohibition work on, or the Volstead subprogram, as it was called because of its author, Andrew J. Volstead, was put into effect. This act located intoxicating liquor as anything having an alcoholic content of anything more(prenominal) than 0.5 percent, omitting alcohol used for medicative and sacramental purposes. Likewise, this act in like manner set up guidelines for enforcement (Bowen, 154). Prohibitio n was intended to switch off the inspiration of alcohol and thereby reduce crime, poverty, death rates, and remedy the scrimping and the quality of life. National ban of alcohol -- the noble audition -- was undertaken to reduce crime and corruption, solve social problems, reduce the impose burden created by prisons and poorhouses, and improve health and hygiene in America (Thorton, 1). This, however, was undoubtedly to no avail.\n\nThe Prohibition amendment of the 1920s was ineffective because it was unenforceable, it caused the explosive growth of crime, and it change magnitude the amount of alcohol consumption. It is unrealizable to tell whether prohibition is a good thing or a bad thing. It has never been enforced in this realm said author Fiorella LaGuardia, author of American Prohibition in the 1920s (LaGuardia 46). After the Volstead Act was put into place to observe specific laws and methods of enforcement, the Federal Prohibition Bureau was formulated in govern t o see that the Volstead Act was enforced. Nevertheless, bootleggers and commoners alike flagrantly profaned these laws.\n\nBootleggers smuggled liquor from oversees and Canada, steal it from government warehouses, and produced their own. Many bulk hid their liquor in renal pelvis flasks, false books, hollow canes, and anything else they could buzz off (Bowen, 159). There were also immoral speak-easies, which replaced saloons after the start of prohibition. By 1925, there were over 100,000 speak-easies in New York City only (Bowen, 160). As good as the ideal sounded, ...prohibition was far easier to invigorate than to enforce (Wenburn, 234). With...If you want to receive a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!